Jérôme Marant <jerome.marant@free.fr> wrote: > En réponse à Arnaud Vandyck <arnaud.vandyck@ulg.ac.be>: > > > Hi, > > > > IMHO, unstable is a good place for it. Upload Conglomerate in > > unstable > > and fill an RC bug "not usable at the moment" to be sure it will not > > go > > to testing, even if it's buggy. > > > > Everyone knows that unstable is not stable ;-) > > BZZZT. Wrong. so I'll not be a Millionnaire this time :'( > "unstable" means unstable packaging, not unstable software. unstable > is not for alpha/beta software except when there is a stable version > around (shipped as -snapshot packages). Thanks for the explanations. And a conglomerate-snapshot is not a good idea? Maybe *-snapshot packages exist only if the package without -snashot exist... -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg Formateur Cellule Programmation.
Attachment:
pgp4AWQgZ5OVm.pgp
Description: PGP signature