On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 01:27:11PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote: > On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 09:30:16AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 09:37:22PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > > [ ] Choice 1: Clone Proof SSD Condorcet Amendment > > > [ ] Choice 2: Further Discussion > > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > > > Where's the option to oppose the proposed amendment? AFAICS, the only > > thing that can be voted for are 'yes, no matter what' and "no, let's > > talk about it further". What if I'd wanted to say "no, no matter what"? > > Adding a "no" option would make things very complicated. You see, > the "yes" option needs a supermajority. The "no" option would not. > That would give us a ballot with mixed supermajority and normal majority > options. Our voting system is currently not able to deal with that > in a sane way; we'd need to upgrade it somehow first. ... Right. (makes a mental note about not even remotely trying to comment on things I don't even understand anyway) -- Wouter Verhelst Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org Nederlandstalige Linux-documentatie -- http://nl.linux.org "An expert can usually spot the difference between a fake charge and a full one, but there are plenty of dead experts." -- National Geographic Channel, in a documentary about large African beasts.
Attachment:
pgpc9cX59vuCE.pgp
Description: PGP signature