* Chris Cheney <ccheney@cheney.cx> [2003-04-29 19:11]: > Testing in almost all cases is worse than unstable. For whom? Depends on what you think testing should be used for. > Two major reasons, it doesn't get security updates at all, It is mentioned over and over again, noted almost everywhere. And it was mentioned again and again that you should feel free to start a security team for testing, noone will hold you back. The think is that noone seems to be really interested in _working_ on security updates for testing, only interested in complaining about them not being there. But according to your buglist I don't think that you would be good in that position, so please just stop complaining, for you don't add anything new to the discussion which just holds up others from doing bugfixes, thanks. > and two you don't even know what bugs are in it since they get closed > when the bug is fixed in unstable. Oh, so you found out the problem with the BTS, too? Nice, but keep in mind that it was mentioned already, too. Feel free to reopen such closed bugs and tag them sarge, as long as you are sure that the version in testing still has the problem. Noone holds you back to do that neither, and it might teach some maintainers to think about it, too. So long! Alfie -- "Es gibt in diesem Netz Gute und Böse. Wer die Bösen sind, entscheiden die Guten." (Michael Ottenbruch in de.admin.news.regeln)
Attachment:
pgprB9vForctZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature