[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Dropping/splitting (proper) i386 support



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 30 April 2003 20:07, Matthias Klose wrote:

> > I notice that we already have /usr/lib/i486/libstdc++.so.5 etc. Does this
> > mean we can have different versions of the library for i386, i486 etc?
>
> No. I had to learn this as well. The new packages only have the
> libstdc++ with the i486 atomicity implementation as gcc-3.2's
> libstdc++ had it. The two implementations must not be mixed.

Did you follow the whole discussion between Martin v. Löwis and me
in the 'Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++' thread? I thought we had
had a solution to this problem. If we haven't, could you tell me
what I missed?

	Arnd <><
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+sRQk5t5GS2LDRf4RAnAJAKCaV0dLZhzCwRLBeiG1yUJpvSCFMACgiiVu
h54O+oM74bgo44+FCux5NNY=
=rbTC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: