On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 16:22:31 +0100 Emile van Bergen <emile-deb@evbergen.xs4all.nl> wrote: > So we have an "adequate" solution implemented and a better one that's > being discussed. That's how it always should be. I don't see any > problem? ;-) The problems of being able to mount /etc read-only and abiding by the FHS havent been solved. In this instance the problem has been redefined to be "where should the ifupdown state file go". Glenn