Re: New maintainer behaviour with NMU and LogJam's hijacking
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 04:41:38PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> If you're complaining that the NMU was handled improperly and that the
> communication/policy should have been better, then it seems you're
> right. The person performing the NMU has already indicated that they
> are sorry they didn't follow policy and so unless you can give
> evidence that you think they will continue to fail to follow policy in
> future then it seems like an honest mistake.
IIRC Ari has caused upset with NMUs before; xscreensaver, I believe. (I
express no opinion about whether that upload was a good idea or not.)
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: