Re: Why are new package versions depending on libc6 in unstable?
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 01:47:35PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
This sort of argument would be a lot more convincing if it came from
people who were doing something about unbreaking libc6.
See, that's a symptom. There are a lot of people whose packages are held
up (preventing them from getting any testing done for their own,
valuable, work) but don't have the skills or obscure platform necessary
to fix a given libc6 bug.
Mike Stone
Reply to: