On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 10:24:10AM -0700, Tom Marshall wrote: > > One major advantage of bogofilter (in addition to being more accurate > > than spamassassin) is that it's blazingly fast. Even though I have a > > high-end computer and a fast net connection, spamassassin really eats > > up cycles when e-mails start coming in in larger groups. bogofilter > > hasn't peaked yet. > > At the risk of sounding like an advertisement, you may want to try out bmf > and/or spamprobe if you are concerned about resources. The bogofilter > executable is insanely huge because it uses lex to tokenize the mail. there was discussion on the bogofilter-dev list about making the lexer smaller by changing one of the lex options. the code to do it was checked in to cvs recently. -- gram
Attachment:
pgpuIF7l5teq4.pgp
Description: PGP signature