Re: attn: bogofilter users
On Monday 30 September 2002 09:46, David Roundy wrote:
>
> But bogofilter isn't in stable, it's only in unstable and this makes a
> difference. So I would say it's better not to clutter up the namespace by
> changing the package name. Of course, I would also tend to vote for the
> interactive preinst, since this is quite a major change. It seems like if
> an interactive preinst is ever appropriate, this would be it.
>
ah. If this is unstable only then sure, do what you want (-:
preinsts chattering still scare me a bit though.
Reply to: