Re: Java policy
Hi again.
I have not seen very much complains on the policy. Actually none
on fact.
So what further steps should I take in order to make this an
official policy?
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 01:56:15PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org> writes:
>
> > There are some things that might want to be added before it
> > becomes truly official.
> >
> > See the policy at:
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/
> >
> > * gcj and how to handle that (should it be mentioned at all?).
>
> I don't have the specifics to that handy. URL?
Somewhere in the debian-java@l.d.o archives, do not remember.
> > * should all virtual machines that provides a java2 virtual machine
> > also provide a 'java2' command (not 'java').
>
> As the originator of this request, I'd be happy to have an "official"
> version without this and punt this to the next version.
Ok.
> > * How to handle jar dependencies? Should there be some kind of
> > mechanism for that?
>
> Since nobody is currently on top of that, I'd suggest leaving it out,
> too.
Agreed.
Regards,
// Ola
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 584 36 LINKÖPING |
| +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: