Re: [2002-07-07] Release Status Update
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> * What could we do to make "testing" more useful?
[Better info about] testing's security support.
> * Why would anyone run "stable" instead of "testing"? Is there
> anything we can change to allow people like that to run
> "testing"?
With regular apt-getting, stable [and unstable] should be reasonable
secure. If I understand correctly, there is currently no maximum
amount of time before which an urgent security fix is guaranteed to
'tickle into testing'.
Greetings,
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: