Re: [RFC] New keymap/language configuration system.
* (Jérôme Marant)
| Tollef Fog Heen <tollef@add.no> writes:
|
| > | BTW, I'm still not convinced by the usage of debconf in d-i ...
| >
| > I don't understand the question, can you rephrase? d-i will use
| > debconf for all user interaction. Changing that would mean throwing
| > away the partly-to-mostly functional system we already have.
|
| OK, let's rephrase: I'm not impressed at all by the usage of
| debconf in d-i, after a first try.
If you can tell what's wrong it would be a lot easier to explain the
train of thoughts or change what's broken.
| Furthermore, I would like to know why people want to focus on d-i
| rather than PGI which seems to more advanced than d-i on many
| grounds. This is a question, not an attack.
I haven't had the time to play with PGI yet. We will have to have a
discussion regarding what installation system we want for sarge: d-i
and/or PGI. We'll also decide whether we will let boot-floppies
handle the corner cases which won't get covered by the first release
of d-i (or if we should spend the time to get d-i to cover them).
The time for that discussion hasn't come yet; We'll release woody
first, and then we can look forward and decide on a course of action.
--
Tollef Fog Heen ,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' :
`. `'
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: