Re: Debian's Social Problems, a descriptive response

To: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>
Cc: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@doctormoo.dyndns.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Debian's Social Problems, a descriptive response
From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
Date: 25 May 2002 21:20:40 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87ptzjilpj.fsf@becket.becket.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87sn4g55i0.fsf@luminous.mit.edu>
References: <[🔎] 20020525190537.GA22712@doctormoo.dyndns.org> <[🔎] 87sn4g55i0.fsf@luminous.mit.edu>

Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> writes:

> I've seen ftpmaster ponder issues for a long time; I've seen ftpmaster
> be really busy, but I can't honestly say I have specific evidence of
> ftpmaster sitting on a package they knew they would never approve.

I thought this is what happened with the special i18n version of apt,
isn't it?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Debian's Social Problems, a descriptive response
  - From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@doctormoo.dyndns.org>
- Re: Debian's Social Problems, a descriptive response
  - From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
Next by Date: Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
Previous by thread: Re: Debian's Social Problems, a descriptive response
Next by thread: Re: Debian's Social Problems, a descriptive response
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread