Re: Debian's Social Problems, a descriptive response
Previously Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> security: Security seems to, on the whole, do a good job. This is an
> inherently controversial topic (what is 'secure enough') and they
> generally deal with it politely but firmly and rationally. Everything
> is very open. Or at least it was; the development of this 'new
> security system' seems to be happening invisibly, or not at all.
The `security system' you mention here has to be build by the
ftpmaster and buildd teams. There is nothing (accept provide
requirements, feedback and grattitude once it's done) that the
security team can do.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/wichert@wiggy.net This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: