Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
Emile van Bergen <emile-deb@evbergen.xs4all.nl> writes:
> What amazes me is that you cannot explain in a few words, to a person
> who is capable of abstract reasoning, and knowledgeable in Unix, QNX,
> and software engineering, why a separate directory is *critical* in the
> Hurd's design for its usability, *while other changes to FHS are not*.
I didn't say it was critical. I said it was the Right Thing. Most
features of most systems are not critical their operation, and there
is no particular reason they should be restricted to such.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: