Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd

To: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
Cc: Debian Devel List <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
Date: 22 May 2002 16:51:16 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87adqragi3.fsf@becket.becket.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020522193500.M5840@justice.loyola.edu>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.40.0205230103490.3925-100000@localhost> <[🔎] 87vg9faiaq.fsf@becket.becket.net> <[🔎] 20020522193500.M5840@justice.loyola.edu>

Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> writes:

> So ideas spring fully formed from the mind of the FHS? Cool!

Of course not.  They get proposed and discussed on the FHS list.  How
else would you think?

Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
  - From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>

References:
- Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
  - From: Emile van Bergen <emile-deb@evbergen.xs4all.nl>
- Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
  - From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
  - From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: where do NEW packages go?
Next by Date: Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
Previous by thread: Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
Next by thread: Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread