Re: checking shared lib sonames, potential mass-filing of bugs.

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: checking shared lib sonames, potential mass-filing of bugs.
From: Paul Slootman <paul@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 11:21:27 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020507092127.GB2619@wurtel.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020505225955.6cfd903b.dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
References: <[🔎] 20020505225955.6cfd903b.dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

On Sun 05 May 2002, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> 
> I've written a crude script to go through Contents-i386.gz file
> to find some suspiciously looking shared library packages.
> It does show up some false positives, but 
> there seem to be real problematic libraries around.

Can you explain what the problem is?  I don't see the point of this.


Paul Slootman


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: checking shared lib sonames, potential mass-filing of bugs.
  - From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

References:
- checking shared lib sonames, potential mass-filing of bugs.
  - From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

Prev by Date: Re: possible mass-filing of bugs: many shared library packages contain binaries in usr/bin
Next by Date: Re: ext3 root partition with kernel-image packages
Previous by thread: list of potential suspicions (Re: checking shared lib sonames, potential mass-filing of bugs.)
Next by thread: Re: checking shared lib sonames, potential mass-filing of bugs.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread