> If you had waited for proper discussion, as the developer's reference > advises, you wouldn't be getting flamed; you'd simply have been told > that there were more effective ways of getting this fixed than 88 RC > bugs, and we wouldn't have to go through this. That's all. Well, you're right. Serious error of protocol on my part. -- Thomas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part