[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 88 Priority violations in woody



On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 07:09:41PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 04:38:02 -0500
> Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> wrote:

> > > * Were was this discussed on this mailing list?  All such mass filings should
> > >   be discussed here first, before being filed.  Not after.

> > And he didn't even use maintonly! I'm glad I'm not subscribed to
> > -bugs-dist right now ...

> Yeah, and I'm pissed :(

> Add it to the list of NM requirements: A NM needs to be able to do QA work 
> *reasonably* before being accepted a maintainer.

Being familiar with the developer's reference is already expected, is it
not?

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: pgpalvZq_cuQV.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: