[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [2002-04-30] Release Status Update



> > that are unreleasable may be considered. Requests from the maintainter
> > for an update to a package will generally be considered a request to
> > remove the package.
> I hope the last sentence was a typo.  Why should a request for update
> should be turned into a request to remove?

Because if you really DO need to get the new package into woody, this
implies that there is a bigger problem with the old version. Thus it
should be removed. But the new version won't be introduced because it
could have numerous unknown new flaws...

Release was scheduled for 1. May, so ANY bug not fixed yet should be
_really_ important to justify an update in woody now.
Just like updates to "stable".

But aj, please update mozilla and galeon - they had some ugly SSL bug.
And that bug pretty sure was in the previous versions, too.
If woody were stable yet, we should do a DSA probably...
/me is playing with the fire ;)

Greetings,
Erich


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: