On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 02:34:55PM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 02:06:19AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > - This undoes the changes Branden made back in October which altered the > > > SDL ABI. > > Joseph, I sincerely hope you're well aware that this has no hope of getting > > into the archive, let alone woody? > > ABI changes have been out of the picture since December. > I hope you bothered to read the thread to figure out WHY this needs to go > in. Joseph, I'm really sorry about this, but the time when you get to make ABI changes like this really is over. > This isn't some haphazard change just because a couple of maintainers and > an upstream author felt inclined to suddenly break things. It's a quickly > planned and executed change which fixes non-Debian binaries in most cases > that they possibly could be fixed, and probably does not break one single > package in Debian. I say probably because I have not (yet) personally > tested them all. And there's the problem. Everything seems quick and easy until you start to roll it out across eleven archictectures and a few dozen packages. I invite you to reread the message posted to -devel-announce way back in November: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2001/debian-devel-announce-200111/msg00006.html Library ABI changes aren't worth the price anymore. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> We came. We Saw. We Conferenced. http://linux.conf.au/ ``Debian: giving you the power to shoot yourself in each toe individually.'' -- with kudos to Greg Lehey
Attachment:
pgpoyV09E1geM.pgp
Description: PGP signature