Re: Question about NMU [was Re: Request for NMUs]
"Christophe Prud'homme" <prudhomm@MIT.EDU> writes:
> * Andreas Rottmann [Jeudi 28 Février 2002 04:02 PM ] :
> | Will Newton <will@misconception.org.uk> writes:
> | > blitz++:
> | >
> | > Likewise I have had no response from the maintainer. The fix is very
> | > small indeed (#134512).
> |
> | I'll care about this one. However, this is my first NMU and I'm not
> | sure about the 'NMU + BTS' section in the developers-ref. Can I close
> | bugs in the changelog or how do I handle this in the BTS?
> the version of Blitz is pretty old
> I have the package for the CVS version with a sane installation, + doc +
> examples and configured for g++-3.0.
>
Won't using g++ 3.0 on platforms where it isn't the standard compiler
cause problems (ABI change).
> It seems that the maintainer is not responsive, so may be the
> package should be taken over in unstable(I volunteer for that since
> I use blitz on a daily basis and I know it pretty well) and NMU the
> current version in woody to fix the blas1 issue !
>
OK, I'll NMU now. I'll put the package in DELAYED/1-day, so if anyone
has a better NMU (I fixed just the s/blas1/blas/ issue) she can
replace it.
Andy
--
Andreas Rottmann | Dru@ICQ | 118634484@ICQ | a.rottmann@gmx.at
Georg-Rendlweg 28 | A-5111 Bürmoos | Austria | Europe
http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62
Reply to: