[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: tar saying all previous tarballs obscolete?



On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 22:53, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 07:29:37PM -0500, Ed Sweetman wrote:
> > Is there a reason why the latest (1.13.25-2) version of tar in debian
> > unstable is telling me that all the tars I'm trying to use from
> > kernel.org are using obscolete base64 headers?  
> 
> you are forgetting the z or j flag to tar:
No, seems my kernel/hdd was corrupting the data...hdd seems to be fine
according to fsck,I've since upgraded kernels.  

 
> [jaqque@cthulhu:/tmp]% tar tf linux-2.4.17.tar.gz 
> tar: This does not look like a tar archive
> tar: Skipping to next header
> tar: Archive contains obsolescent base-64 headers
> tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
> zsh: exit 2     tar tf linux-2.4.17.tar.gz
> [jaqque@cthulhu:/tmp]% tar tf linux-2.4.17.tar.bz2
> tar: This does not look like a tar archive
> tar: Skipping to next header
> tar: Archive contains obsolescent base-64 headers
> tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
> zsh: exit 2     tar tf linux-2.4.17.tar.bz2
> 
> if you have a gzipped version, use the z flag, if you have the bz2
> version, use the j flag. if you don't know what version you have, run
> file on it:
> 
> [jaqque@cthulhu:/tmp]% file linux-2.4.17.tar.gz 
> linux-2.4.17.tar.gz: gzip compressed data, deflated, last modified: Fri Dec 21 09:45:54 2001, os: Unix
> [jaqque@cthulhu:/tmp]% file linux-2.4.17.tar.bz2 
> linux-2.4.17.tar.bz2: bzip2 compressed data, block size = 900k
> 
> -john




Reply to: