Re: Strange behaviour in incoming...
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 06:45:02AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-01-16 at 02:53, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > The reason why I'm asking is if I have made something wrong I can fix
> > that but I have to know what's wrong then. :) I mean it has gone almost
> > 2 moths since I uploaded so something must be wrong (either with me
> > or with the ftp).
>
> Maybe I've just been using too much crack today, but I swear I remember
> seeing a message from the ftp-master somewhere saying that these dummy
> java packages were a bad idea, and weren't going to go in...
Well first he was complaining mainly on non-free packages in main.
Secondly theese dummy packages already exists, but a different source
packages. I wanted to bring them together to make it easier to
maintain. So there is no big difference. I also asked in the debian-java
list about it and people seems to want it. I do not really want it but
it seems to be needed because of the nature of java.
I also got a reply later that said that it was the non-free stuff that
was the real issue so I fixed that and reuploaded. Then nothing
have happend.
So is this the real problem? If so what should I do? Get the proposed
java policy to become a true policy or is there a easier way?
Regards,
// Ola
> [time passes]
>
> Ah, found it:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2001/debian-java-200110/msg00067.html
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 584 36 LINKÖPING |
| +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: