Re: Preparing a Proposal: 3 DD needed for every NEW package

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Preparing a Proposal: 3 DD needed for every NEW package
From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 15:39:29 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020101153929.B9753@silly.cloud.net.au>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E16L0P8-0000uq-00@klecker.debian.org>; from dancer@netfort.gr.jp on Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 05:09:06PM +0900
References: <[🔎] 20011229103136.GA522@ogre> <[🔎] 20011229131415.GA4148@leom181.leom.ec-lyon.fr> <[🔎] E16L0P8-0000uq-00@klecker.debian.org>

On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 05:09:06PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Unmaintained, unused, and untested packages are in Debian.
> If no one uses these packages, bugs won't be filed.

If no one uses the package, the bugs are not a problem! :-)


Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>

Reply to:

References:
- Preparing a Proposal: 3 DD needed for every NEW package
  - From: Lenart Janos <ocsi@debian.org>
- Re: Preparing a Proposal: 3 DD needed for every NEW package
  - From: Josselin Mouette <josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org>
- Re: Preparing a Proposal: 3 DD needed for every NEW package
  - From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

Prev by Date: Re: quake I for woody
Next by Date: Re: visual c
Previous by thread: Re: Preparing a Proposal: 3 DD needed for every NEW package
Next by thread: Re: Preparing a Proposal: 3 DD needed for every NEW package
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread