Re: ITP: atm
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001 10:56:43 +0200, Russell Coker
<russell@coker.com.au> wrote:
>On Fri, 24 Aug 2001 20:17, Marc Haber wrote:
>> There is an open RFP #109612 for that package, but I won't get around
>> packaging the atm-tools before the freeze.
>
>Do you think I should call the main package atm-tools instead of atm which is
>the name I currently use?
Yes, I think so. raidtools give a good example. Makes clear that
installing the package does not give working atm, but a special kernel
is necessary.
>Actually there is no lib. That's one thing I think needs to be done, the
>code should be split out into a shared object and save a few hundred K of
>disk space.
Isn't that a upstream problem?
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Karlsruhe, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29
Reply to:
- References:
- ITP: atm
- From: russell@coker.com.au (Russell Coker)
- Re: ITP: atm
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
- Re: ITP: atm
- From: Marc Haber <debian-devel.lists.debian.org@marc-haber.de>
- Re: ITP: atm
- From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>