[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Conflict: libgb



On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 02:24:15AM -0500, Ben Burton wrote:
> 
> Hi.  I am currently packaging Gnome Basic (ITP: #94328) which wishes to
> install /usr/lib/libgb.* and /usr/lib/libgbrun.*.
> 
> After searching through the debian package directory it appears that package
> sgb also installs /usr/lib/libgb.*.  Gnome Basic is unrelated to package sgb
> and the libraries have completely different functionalities.

Hi!

As the sgb maintainer, it would probably have been wise to email me as
well (sgb@packages.debian.org would do).  I just happened to see the
email....

Anyway, is the Gnome Basic library "standard" (in some vague sense of
the word)?  Do people expect it to be installed with that name?  I
have no idea how many people are already linking their programs to
libgb (the Stanford GraphBase version), so I am a little nervous about
changing the name.  There are no packages in Debian which use it,
however, so it might not be so terrible to change it.

   Julian

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

         Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
       Debian GNU/Linux Developer,  see http://people.debian.org/~jdg
  Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/



Reply to: