Re: libc6 broken?
> * Taral <taral@taral.net> [010426 21:40]:
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote:
> > > If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this
> > > error-msg:
> > > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_debug_mask@GLIBC_2.2.3'
> > > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_debug_printf@GLIBC_2.2.3'
> >
> > Uh, why do you have libc 2.2.3? We don't have libc 2.2.3 in the archive.
We have libc 2.2.3 in both unstableand testing:
libc6 >= 2.2.2-2 is a CVS snapshot of 2.2.3 that defines this symbol:
<-- snip -->
$ objdump -p /lib/libc.so.6
...
Version definitions:
1 0x01 0x0865f4e6 libc.so.6
2 0x00 0x0d696910 GLIBC_2.0
3 0x00 0x0d696911 GLIBC_2.1
GLIBC_2.0
4 0x00 0x09691f71 GLIBC_2.1.1
GLIBC_2.1
5 0x00 0x09691f72 GLIBC_2.1.2
GLIBC_2.1.1
6 0x00 0x09691f73 GLIBC_2.1.3
GLIBC_2.1.2
7 0x00 0x0d696912 GLIBC_2.2
GLIBC_2.1.3
8 0x00 0x09691a71 GLIBC_2.2.1
GLIBC_2.2
9 0x00 0x09691a72 GLIBC_2.2.2
GLIBC_2.2.1
10 0x00 0x09691a73 GLIBC_2.2.3
GLIBC_2.2.2
Version References:
required from ld-linux.so.2:
0x09691f71 0x00 15 GLIBC_2.1.1
0x09691a73 0x00 14 GLIBC_2.2.3
0x0d696911 0x00 13 GLIBC_2.1
0x0d696912 0x00 12 GLIBC_2.2
0x0d696910 0x00 11 GLIBC_2.0
$ dpkg --status libc6
Package: libc6
Status: install ok installed
Priority: required
Section: base
Installed-Size: 8412
Maintainer: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
Source: glibc
Version: 2.2.2-4
...
<-- snip -->
cu
Adrian
--
Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht,
sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.
Reply to: