Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:56:58PM -0500, Rob Browning wrote:
> Just in case anyone else was confused, I'm still in favor of having at
> least *one* precompiled kernel per-architecture, so no one *has* to
> compile a kernel,
i think everyone is in favour of that.
the issue is whether it's appropriate to have a dozen or so kernel-image
packages (and associated kernel-headers packages) per kernel version,
when one(*) will do.
(*) or whatever the minimum number is that will boot on all ia32 boxes.
craig
--
craig sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
GnuPG Key: 1024D/CD5626F0
Key fingerprint: 9674 7EE2 4AC6 F5EF 3C57 52C3 EC32 6810 CD56 26F0
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: David Schleef <ds@schleef.org>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Dave Benson <daveb@ffem.org>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Dave Benson <daveb@ffem.org>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>