Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:19:29AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> I'm actually referring to all binary modules. But for binary-only modules
> in particular, since you don't have the luxuary of being able to recompile
> them, it's even more important to supply the builder with enough information
> assuming that they're willing to compile it for your specifications.
and asking them to compile a dozen different versions makes things
better for binary module distributors?
--
Mike Stone
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Daniel Stone <daniel@kabuki.openfridge.net>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Daniel Stone <daniel@kabuki.openfridge.net>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Daniel Stone <daniel@kabuki.openfridge.net>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@vitelus.com>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@vitelus.com>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>