Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:01:39PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:00:01PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > If we don't distribute them, why in hell are we breaking mirrors by
> > supporting them? Sounds dodgy to me.
>
> So that they can compile them? If you don't understand why we should do
> that, then there's no point in us two arguing about it.
I can understand why you might say that that's a valid point, but IMHO, we
shouldn't fuck up current users (by overloading mirrors), just so we can
support LAZY users to compile something THAT IS NOT EVEN IN DEBIAN.
--
Daniel Stone
Linux Kernel Developer
daniel@kabuki.openfridge.net
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
G!>CS d s++:- a---- C++ ULS++++$>B P---- L+++>++++ E+(joe)>+++ W++ N->++ !o
K? w++(--) O---- M- V-- PS+++ PE- Y PGP>++ t--- 5-- X- R- tv-(!) b+++ DI+++
D+ G e->++ h!(+) r+(%) y? UF++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Reply to: