[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: automating debconf



On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 09:56:48AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 03:34:17PM +0100, Arthur Korn wrote:
> > Craig Sanders schrieb:
> > > it wouldn't be a problem at all (in fact, it would be a fantastic tool!)
> > > if debconf was also able to accept answers to questions from stdin.
> > 
> > This would be a suboptimal fix. 
> 
> what's "suboptimal" about making debconf work like any other unix tool?
> 
> one of the strengths of unix is that data & configuration details can
> be piped around and transformed and manipulated using the whole swag of
> unix text manipulation tools. plain-text configuration is a strength,
> not a weakness.

You haven't read "The Unix Philosophy" by Michael Gancarz[1], have
you?  Great book for any UNIX pundant or newbie alike.  The author
comes to the same conclusion about UNIX tools, "Everything is a
filter."

References
----------
1. ISBN-1555581234 (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1555581234/o/qid=982866473/sr=8-1/ref=aps_sr_b_1_1/106-2753579-5532466)

-- 
Chad Walstrom <chewie@wookimus.net>                 | a.k.a. ^chewie
http://www.wookimus.net/                            | s.k.a. gunnarr
Key fingerprint = B4AB D627 9CBD 687E 7A31  1950 0CC7 0B18 206C 5AFD

Attachment: pgp0zhKVKk6XH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: