Re: update excuses.. how to read them
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 09:37:47AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> writes:
>
> Daniel> On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 03:33:40PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> >> >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> writes:
> >>
> >> >> Will these packages install in testing in 2 days time, or
> >> will >> the out-of-date stuff cause problems? How do I find out
> >> why it >> isn't getting compiled?
> >>
> Daniel> They won't install until the out-of-date issues are
> Daniel> resolved.
> >> So,just to make matters crystal clear (as mud), are out-of-date
> >> problems caused by build-depends not being satisfied, depends
> >> not being satisfied, or one of the above?
>
> Daniel> An out-of-date issue means the package is not compiled for
> Daniel> that architecture, that's all.
>
> hmmm.
>
> Well my guess is that heimdal is not being built on alpha,
> because of bug #77794 in ncurses5 (61 days old). I hope
> something is being done to try and resolve this problem...
>
> As for m68k, I couldn't see any problems here...
Eh? #77794 only affects Sparc.
Dan
/--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\
| Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University |
| dan@debian.org | | dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu |
\--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
Reply to: