[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#75382: marked as done ()



Your message dated Sat, 2 Dec 2000 01:13:23 +0000
with message-id <20001202011322.A32181@riva.ucam.org>
and subject line Closing spurious bug-buddy reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2000 07:46:39 +0000
>From root@thrunet.com Mon Oct 23 02:46:39 2000
Return-path: <root@thrunet.com>
Received: from s210-218-150-164.thrunet.ne.kr (thrunet.com) [::ffff:210.218.150.164] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 13ncJT-00088D-00; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 02:46:36 -0500
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by thrunet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA00808;
	Mon, 23 Oct 2000 16:52:01 +0900
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 16:52:01 +0900
Message-Id: <200010230752.QAA00808@thrunet.com>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
From: hong seungmok <pentboy@hanmail.net>
Subject: 
X-Mailer: bug-buddy 0.6
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: general
Severity: normal
Version: 

>Synopsis: 
>Class: sw-bug
System: Linux 2.2.15-2.5.0ax i586 unknown


Debugging information:
(no debugging symbols found)...Core was generated by `krootwm'.
Program terminated with signal 11, ¼¼±×¸àÅ×ÀÌ¼Ç ¿À·ù.
(no debugging symbols found)...#0  0x0 in ?? ()
#0  0x0 in ?? ()
#0  0x0 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#0  0x0 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#0  0x0 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#0  0x0 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#0  0x0 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#0  0x0 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#0  0x0 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#0  0x0 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 75382-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2000 01:06:19 +0000
>From cjw44@flatline.org.uk Fri Dec 01 19:06:19 2000
Return-path: <cjw44@flatline.org.uk>
Received: from mta03-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.43] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 142187-0002Jn-00; Fri, 01 Dec 2000 19:06:19 -0600
Received: from riva.ucam.org ([62.253.132.107]) by mta03-svc.ntlworld.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP
          id <20001202010616.NDKC3796.mta03-svc.ntlworld.com@riva.ucam.org>;
          Sat, 2 Dec 2000 01:06:16 +0000
Received: from cjw44 by riva.ucam.org with local (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
	id 1421Ex-00005a-00; Sat, 02 Dec 2000 01:13:23 +0000
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 01:13:23 +0000
From: Colin Watson <cjw44@flatline.org.uk>
To: 58418-done@bugs.debian.org, 64287-done@bugs.debian.org,
	65769-done@bugs.debian.org, 66060-done@bugs.debian.org,
	66442-done@bugs.debian.org, 67257-done@bugs.debian.org,
	75382-done@bugs.debian.org, 77839-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Closing spurious bug-buddy reports
Message-ID: <20001202011322.A32181@riva.ucam.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Organization: riva.ucam.org
Delivered-To: 75382-done@bugs.debian.org

I'm closing a slew of spurious bug-buddy reports, all filed with
reference to Red Hat distributions, containing either no information or
a traceback with no context (and often no symbols). An example follows:

>Package: general
>Severity: normal
>Version: 1.0.51
>
>>Synopsis: 
>>Class: sw-bug
>Distribution: Red Hat Linux release 6.2 (Zoot)
>System: Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686 unknown

Since this is the bug tracking system for a different distribution
(Debian), there's no good reason to leave these bugs open. If you have
further queries, you'll almost certainly want to contact Red Hat, not
us.

Regards,

-- 
Colin Watson                                     [cjw44@flatline.org.uk]



Reply to: