Re: shared NFS systems
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 02:13:07PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> I think it should be an important goal of Debian to work properly,
> without resorting to hacks, on systems which share one or more files
> using something like NFS (from sharing /usr all the way through to
> sharing / for nfsroot systems).
>
> [...]
>
> If you spot any mistakes or possible improvements, please send me a
> patch file for the *.xml file, and I will consider applying it ASAP.
> Alternatively, if somebody else wants to maintain this file, go
> ahead...
I don't have a working XML docbook environment to test whether this is correct,
but my editor likes it. A patch is attached which discusses how a possible
kernel extension (union mounts) could simplify the situation.
--
- mdz
*** nfs-dpkg.xml.old Mon Nov 27 22:05:40 2000
--- nfs-dpkg.xml Mon Nov 27 22:50:05 2000
***************
*** 164,169 ****
--- 164,190 ----
think some of the details are too different from how it is currently
done.</para>
</listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Some of these problems would go away if the kernel supported
+ some kind of union filesystem layer. For example:
+ </para>
+
+ <screen>
+ $ mount -o union /tmp/scratch /usr $ mount -o union
+ ...same for other shared mount points...
+ </screen>
+
+ <para>
+ Then, a package could be installed, and modifications to
+ /usr would be written to a scratch filesystem (which would
+ eventually be thrown away). Local modifications to /etc,
+ /var, etc. would still take place, but files installed to
+ /usr would be ignored in favor of the shared versions once
+ the scratch filesystem was unmounted.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
</orderedlist>
</section>
Reply to:
- Prev by Date:
ITP: powermanga, rcalc, gniall, broadcast2000, mpeg2movie, xmovie, dgen, ez-ipupdate, netsh, narval, koalamud, smaug, papaya
- Next by Date:
Re: off-topic: election humor
- Previous by thread:
Re: shared NFS systems
- Next by thread:
Re: shared NFS systems
- Index(es):