Re: Transitioning to no non-free
On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 07:37:49PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
>
> In any case, we've got at least until woody is out to worry about it.
> Potato can continue like this.
Does this mean that the unstable (and frozen?) woody may eventually
have non-free and stable released potato will not.
And what about packages pools? If package pools are working before
non-free is removed, will package pools apply to non free (and may be
hosted elsewere when woody is released)
I mean do you care about leaving this transition task up to another
organisation (the one eventually managing non-free debs repository)?
A+
--
Fabrice Gautier
gautier@email.enst.fr
Reply to: