Re: thinking together artwork to 'Wheezy'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2012 09:21 PM, Menelaos Maglis wrote:
> Although, a quick irc meeting is helping interactivity and get things
> started faster, I think it is a better idea to stick to the mailing-list
> interface for ideas, comments and discussions.
>
My point exactly, the IRC contact would help settling some thoughts in a
more alert way, we can get accustomed to each other's visions and have a
quicker start. Or maybe I am wrong, the idea has a few flaws itself, and
now, rethinking it I am only seeing them better. It would only be more
difficult to keep the track of random scattered ideas all over the
channel's main chat, log them, group and then summarize them to the list.
> I will be in #debian-desktop at irc.freenode.net
> on Sat Mar 3 20:45:00 CET 2012 (that is UTC+1 : Germany) for about 1h.
>
I guess we can still encounter some interested party over the IRC and
settle some ideas there, but a group/crowd gathered there would be a bit
too chaotic.
I have a conclusion though. I will be available on IRC whenever
possible, allowing anybody interested in shaping Wheezy to interact with
me and exchange some thoughts. Any relevant conversation that will
happen there will be summarized on lists@d.o.
After those few hours that passed since my previous email, I actually
feel so bad for issuing such an unfortunate idea of a chaotic online
event. Let's just stick to the list for now, we have plenty of work to
do :-)
Regards,
Victor
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Debian GNU/Linux - Romania
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPUoiOAAoJEG+j4Op+hzAauFkH/A84ujgWZ21WyfZr0n8fOLBn
gOlC+CQWat0SLaWEXoD6v50l/wU4wbwjusH/cRNZO68CKENuBhLFLuTC/XmShJ7d
Jr0BI72z1wArwz0wY0+OnzYPJ+QnMYs4rjIJi9m826JWTGQ85Vym1NVl6ZhUuRx1
G8diyHT27s4elb3cR6gtGKt1sb8FbM/NvAU/1n+IkUqsiQpMmO2Br71dIHtpXLHZ
pY30qAZcXAWde8i5KsDhptzsp2SQR39oytGBcU8wMVZTta2B6O/nK6skgUENekaa
OvfobqSFgkp6b9KYBqJIdfuDGvkm8zw6ZdGvyrJziK1OP/7pE3KfUb+H4W42X08=
=fmex
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: