Paul Wise wrote: > The desktop artwork for wheezy was discussed last month: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-desktop/2011/10/threads.html#00003 > > Here is my summary mail from that thread: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-desktop/2011/10/msg00014.html > > The KDE and GNOME teams both do not want any Debian-specific artwork > enabled by default. Not quite, Joss doesn't want icon/theme changes but is open to a desktop background in http://lists.debian.org/debian-desktop/2011/10/msg00022.html I personally feel sticking with upstream desktop branding, possibly lightly altered to add a Debian logo in the login or desktop background is the right choice. > AFAICT neither of them have asked d-i folks to > remove it from the task-desktop package deps though. tasksel only pulls in desktop-base, it does not itself have anything to do with the theme. If we're removing spacefun then d-i can revert to the old "klowner" boot logo, possibly updated in some way for wheezy, but the current one will work ok. Reverting abbc21a955dc2f9b2fc134e796ef0bfcf4c3a2d2 in rootskel-gtk will despacefun the graphical installer. However, it's good to have visual consistency between the d-i and debian-live and grub boot graphics, so I'd like to get a consensus about how wheezy should look on boot before making too many changes. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature