[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#582492: marked as done (desktop-base: Please remove kde3 global settings for squeeze)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:43:16 +0100
with message-id <1290336196.21296.18.camel@hidalgo>
and subject line Closed in 6.0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #582492,
regarding desktop-base: Please remove kde3 global settings for squeeze
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

582492: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582492
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: desktop-base
Version: 5.0.5
Severity: minor

ebene:~$ dpkg -S /etc/kde3/kdeglobals 
desktop-base: /etc/kde3/kdeglobals

kde3 is obsolete in squeeze.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (100, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages desktop-base depends on:
ii  librsvg2-common               2.26.3-1   SAX-based renderer library for SVG

desktop-base recommends no packages.

Versions of packages desktop-base suggests:
ii  gnome                         1:2.28+7   The GNOME Desktop Environment, wit

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 6.0.1

MHm, I missed that bug, but this is done in the just uploaded 6.0.1
version of desktop-base.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--- End Message ---

Reply to: