Re: split desktop-base package
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Gustavo Noronha Silva<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 11:18 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>> Yeah, sorry I missed that (I thought qt used that too, and missed it was
>> a gtk stuff). Loïc seems to have added it at one time. For the Xfce pov,
>> I don't need it, I already recommends librsvg-common in needing
>> packages, and could upgrade that to Depends if really needed. Not sure
>> about GNOME and other stuff, but I'm not sure it really belongs in
>> Loïc, Josselin, what do you think?
> I think keeping desktop-base as a single source package, and providing
> separate binary packages for each desktop when deps are required is the
> way to go.
Agreed -- same source package is a must have, btw.
-- Gustavo "stratus" Franco