On dim, 2008-12-21 at 13:07 +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote: > But I still think that the desktop-base.postinst script is too touchy > abouth this. Is a failing splashy installation really important? Why > not simply ignore it? There seems to be a number of installations > where > it otherwise will make desktop-base upgrades fail. I'm including a > suggested patch. Yes I think we'll end up with something like that for squeeze (or drop splashy completely) Cheers, -- Yves-Alexis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part