Am Saturday 10 July 2004 11:03 schrieb Thomas Hood:
> Has anyone looked into CFG (Config4GNU)? It looks to me as if it
> deserves some serious consideration.
seriously, that's quite how I see it, too. It's design would't interfere with
debconf. Debconf may even benefit from it.
Ok, the tarball is outdated and cvs development by the two founders has been
mostly on ice this year due to their limited time. (Exept work on a cut down
Still, I think it would be worth while to pick up the work on it, comparing
it's design and use-cases to other options and considering that it really
wouln't be a start from zero.
- Re: CFG?
- From: "C. Gatzemeier" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- From: Thomas Hood <email@example.com>