Am Mittwoch, den 26.10.2011, 08:49 +1100 schrieb Karl Goetz: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:57:20 +0200 > Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org> wrote: > > > On 25/10/2011 09:50, Paul Wise wrote: > > > > > > For the presentation side of things I am thinking one approach > > > might be to move UbuntuDiff[8] to the QA infrastructure, generalise > > > it and enhance it for this purpose. This will necessarily include > > > mechanisms to mark patches as having been dealt with or ignorable. > > > > > > 8. http://ubuntudiff.debian.net/ > > [...] > > > About source code, it is written in OCaml. I realize that OCaml is > > not the best candidate if we want people to contribute patches (or > > even have a look at the code) :) It depends on who wants to > > contribute here. I'm open to suggestions… > > If integration with PTS is planned (and or if you're using > ubuntu-distro-info) perhaps python would make sense as a language > choice. ubuntu-distro-info is implemented in Haskell (since version 0.3) and has an Python and Perl library. -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part