On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:57:20 +0200 Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org> wrote: > On 25/10/2011 09:50, Paul Wise wrote: > > > > For the presentation side of things I am thinking one approach > > might be to move UbuntuDiff[8] to the QA infrastructure, generalise > > it and enhance it for this purpose. This will necessarily include > > mechanisms to mark patches as having been dealt with or ignorable. > > > > 8. http://ubuntudiff.debian.net/ [...] > About source code, it is written in OCaml. I realize that OCaml is > not the best candidate if we want people to contribute patches (or > even have a look at the code) :) It depends on who wants to > contribute here. I'm open to suggestions… If integration with PTS is planned (and or if you're using ubuntu-distro-info) perhaps python would make sense as a language choice. > ¹: btw, the tool's name is “maddie”. Hopefully it won't be confused with (r)maddison :) thanks, kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK7FOSS) http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature