[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: your mail



Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> user debbugs@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debbugs@packages.debian.org (was don@donarmstrong.com).
> usertag 549632 pkgreport
Usertags were: pkgreport.cgi.
Usertags are now: pkgreport.cgi pkgreport.
> usertag 553661 api
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: api.
> usertag 555023 pkgreport
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: pkgreport.
> usertag 556629 process
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: process.
> usertag 558379 api
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: api.
> usertag 558380 api
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: api.
> usertag 564183 service
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: service.
> usertag 565513 api
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: api.
> usertag 566974 process
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: process.
> usertag 569529 pkgreport
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: pkgreport.
> usertag 571018 process
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: process.
> usertag 575653 service
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: service.
> usertag 576961 api
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: api.
> usertag 580406 misc
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: misc.
> usertag 584922 misc
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: misc.
> usertag 588315 service
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: service.
> usertag 589104 service
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: service.
> usertag 590269 misc
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: misc.
> usertag 590931 misc
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: misc.
> usertag 592891 documentation
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: documentation.
> usertag 600234 service
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: service.
> usertag 609885 misc
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: misc.
> usertag 610703 bugreport
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: bugreport.
> usertag 614351 process
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: process.
> usertag 622691 bugreport
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: bugreport.
> usertag 626564 misc
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: misc.
> usertag 628720 bugreport
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: bugreport.
> usertag 631480 pkgreport
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: pkgreport.
> usertag 631500 api
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: api.
> usertag 639877 misc
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: misc.
> usertag 665001 packaging
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: packaging.
> usertag 680493 process
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: process.
> usertag 684113 bugreport
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: bugreport.
> usertag 693294 mail
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: mail.
> usertag 693862 service
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: service.
> usertag 694979 api
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: api.
> usertag 698283 packaging
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: packaging.
> usertag 704821 process
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: process.
> usertag 704984 service
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: service.
> usertag 705155 process
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: process.
> usertag 707019 bugreport
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: bugreport.
> usertag 708075 misc
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: misc.
> usertag 708170 service
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: service.
> usertag 708537 process
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: process.
> usertag 709175 process
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: process.
> retitle 709175 rethink stripping of [] as both current options are broken; maybe just be smarter about adding bug number?
Bug #709175 [debbugs] Mailing list name in Subject: field of processed mails (please revert commit c05083e5394af9c9cad1cfe84e188b9f82e2d2b4)
Changed Bug title to 'rethink stripping of [] as both current options are broken; maybe just be smarter about adding bug number?' from 'Mailing list name in Subject: field of processed mails (please revert commit c05083e5394af9c9cad1cfe84e188b9f82e2d2b4)'
> reassign 709208  bugs.debian.org
Bug #709208 [debbugs] debbugs: Add 'license' to allowable tags
Bug reassigned from package 'debbugs' to 'bugs.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions 2.4.1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #709208 to the same values previously set
> usertag 711869 service
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: service.
> usertag 712979 api
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: api.
> usertag 718570 misc
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: misc.
> usertag 720586 api
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: api.
> usertag 722420 service
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: service.
> usertag 742084 misc
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: misc.
> usertag 746206 process
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: process.
> usertag 747239 process
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: process.
> usertag 749126 bugreport
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: bugreport.
> usertag 751095 service
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: service.
> usertag 752193 misc
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: misc.
> usertag 753683 pkgreport
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: pkgreport.
> usertag 761995 misc
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: misc.
> usertag 762502 bugreport
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: bugreport.
> usertag 763434 pkgreport
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: pkgreport.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
709175: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709175
709208: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709208
763434: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763434
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems


Reply to: