Bug#537755: marked as done (merged and closed bug still listed as relevant RC bug)
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:31:32 -0700
with message-id <20090720233132.GN12392@volo.donarmstrong.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#537755: merged and closed bug still listed as relevant RC bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #537755,
regarding merged and closed bug still listed as relevant RC bug
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
537755: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537755
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debbugs
Severity: important
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I’m checking the testing migration status for cdbs now, and I found that
it does not migrate due to supposedly open RC bugs. Here are the
artefacts at the time of writing:
http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/britney/unstable-nr
lists
cdbs 536992
536992 and 537011 were merged (Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:42:05 GMT):
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=39;bug=536992
537011 was closed via a message to -done (Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:58:00 +0200):
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537011#46
537011 bug listing header reflects correct information („Done: Jonas
Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>“, green box in dependency graph), but 536992
does not show any change after the merge.
Jonas, to allow the migration, you might want to send a -done mail to
536992 as well, to work around the issue. In general, something seems to
be wrong here (or I didn’t understand the intended semantics here).
Greetings,
Joachim
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkpkrY8ACgkQ9ijrk0dDIGx94gCfVI+dkEWs5q5AjgUyAhiMBHFb
Xw0AoMTVe0c8d8CUlJ4CG1x96lksH649
=a6sY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Am Montag, den 20.07.2009, 20:36 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> > >http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/britney/unstable-nr
> > >lists
> > >cdbs 536992
> >
> > Not now that I look.
>
> Interesting. Maybe these lists are generated less frequent that the
> package report pages?
That's correct. Those lists are static, and regenerated by the bugscan
cronjob which runs four times a day, whereas the package report pages
are "the state of the bts right this second".
Closing since I think it resolves this, but please reopen if it doesn't.
Don Armstrong
--
After the first battle of Sto Lat, I formulated a policy which has
stood me in good stead in other battles. It is this: if an enemy has
an impregnable stronghold, see he stays there.
-- Terry Pratchett _Jingo_ p265
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
--- End Message ---
Reply to: