[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#484789: 2007-14 as Year-Month: what's the status of this bug?



tag 484789  - pending
thanks


On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 20:10:47 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:

> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 20:48:24 -0700 Don Armstrong wrote:
[...]
> > If it's pending, this means that I've fixed it and have deployed a fix
> > on b.d.o, and it will be fixed in the package the next time I make an
> > upload.
> 
> That's strange, because I experienced the bug on Wed, Oct  1 2008
> 19:57:08 +0200: during an attempt to upgrade texlive-latex-base from
> version 2007.dfsg.1-3 to version 2007.dfsg.1-4, apt-listbugs once again
> exited with the "invalid date" error message.
> 
> As a consequence, I thought that the debbugs issue, though marked as
> "pending", was still unfixed on the BTS...

I've just experienced this bug, once again, during another upgrade of
texlive-latex-base, from version 2007.dfsg.1-4 to version 2007.dfsg.1-5
(which has just migrated to testing).

I think this bug should *not* be considered "pending", since it does
*not* seem to be fixed on b.d.o: I am therefore dropping the "pending"
tag.
If I am misunderstanding something, please explain.


-- 
 On some search engines, searching for my nickname AND
 "nano-documents" may lead you to my website...  
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgp06mQVEc3Rv.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: