SMTP 550 on replies to bugs
Hallo.
Is it new policy to closed bugs or what? If it is, it's very sad, that i
can't contribute info, replying to users ccing bts, as in reply-to.
== Example: ==
>From MAILER-DAEMON Thu Sep 06 12:00:12 2007
Received: by barikada.upol.cz (Spam Firewall)
id 4E76A6F131; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:45:04 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:45:04 +0200 (CEST)
From: MAILER-DAEMON (Mail Delivery System)
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
This is the Spam Firewall at barikada.upol.cz.
I'm sorry to inform you that the message below could not be delivered.
When delivery was attempted, the following error was returned.
<435723@bugs.debian.org>: host bugs.debian.org[140.211.166.43] said: 550
unknown user (in reply to RCPT TO command)
--CCDC76F133.1189071904/barikada.upol.cz
Content-Description: Delivery error report
Content-Type: message/delivery-status
Reporting-MTA: dns; barikada.upol.cz
Arrival-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:45:01 +0200 (CEST)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; 435723@bugs.debian.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Diagnostic-Code: X-Spam-Firewall; host bugs.debian.org[140.211.166.43] said:
550 unknown user (in reply to RCPT TO command)
--CCDC76F133.1189071904/barikada.upol.cz
Content-Description: Undelivered Message
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Received: from flower (flower.upol.cz [158.194.64.22])
by barikada.upol.cz (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP
id 9F8216F131; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:45:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from flower (flower.upol.cz [158.194.64.22]) by barikada.upol.cz with ESMTP id xb16H6maLRZlQWci; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 11:45:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from olecom by flower with local (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <olecom@flower.upol.cz>)
id 1ITE9g-0003o1-KT; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:00:08 +0200
To: Leon Bottou <leon@bottou.org>, 435723@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#435723: Some info (printf with %g causes a segmentation violation.)
In-Reply-To: <200708030916.57058.leon@bottou.org>
References: <200708021644.06947.leon@bottou.org> <20070803123415.GA6986@scowler.net> <200708030916.57058.leon@bottou.org>
User-Agent: slrn + jed (x86_64-pc-linux-glibc-debian)
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 12:00:08 +0200
Message-Id: <E1ITE9g-0003o1-KT@flower>
From: Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz>
Organization: Palacky University in Olomouc, experimental physics department
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-glibc-debian
* Fri, 3 Aug 2007 09:16:56 -0400, Leon Bottou:
>
[]
> This segfault is a little bit freaky.
> The value 9.9999999999999991e-05 is important.
> If you take 10e-5, no segfault.
> A debug trace suggests that printf calls wmemset
> with incorrect arguments. I'll try to learn more.
Message-ID: <87y7ixb6wb.fsf@rho.meyering.net>
<http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha/12394>
In case if it's useful.
____
--CCDC76F133.1189071904/barikada.upol.cz--
== ==
--
-o--=O`C
#oo'L O
<___=E M
Reply to: