[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#339141: There are some unarchived bugs left



On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Don Armstrong wrote:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/version.cgi?package=phylip;found=phylip%2F1%3A3.6.1-2;fixed=phylip%2F1%3A3.65-1;info=1

phylip 1:3.6.1-2 is still buggy and is in unstable and testing.

Perhaps this is because of the missing mipsel package according to

   http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=phylip

OK, that might make sense.  I did not noticed this functionality because
a bug was archived once it was marked done for 28 days.  I agree that it
makes sense to keep it as long as the package did not reached testing.

#394604

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/version.cgi?package=med-common;found=debian-med%2F0.12;fixed=cdd%2F0.3.11.1;info=1

This is fixed in cdd/0.3.11 which has nothing to do with the package
in which the bug was found, debian-med. It should either be fixed in a
debian-med version, or if it is a bug in cdd, reassigned to cdd,
marked found with an appropriate version, and closed with an
appropriate version.

Makes sense and is explained in the text - but I admit not in the controling
tag fields - this should be fixed now.

or #423205

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/version.cgi?package=tipptrainer;found=tipptrainer%2F0.6.0-10;fixed=tipptrainer%2F0.6.0-11;info=1

0.6.0-10 is buggy and is still present in unstable:

http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&exact=1&keywords=tipptrainer

Same as for phylip.  Mips and mipsel seems to prevent the propagation of
several packages.  Thanks for enlighten me for the reasons why these bugs
remain.  I think I do now understand the graphs better.

Sesse has gone and written a nice tutorial on version tracking which
will help resolve some of these questions:

http://wiki.debian.org/BugsVersionTracking

This is definitely helpful.

and you'll notice that almost all of the questions I've refered to the
version graphs, which is how I myself figure out what is happening;
they help to clarify this sort of thing quite a bit.

I did not yet managed to sort out the rationale behind these graphs -
even if I have to admit now that it is really not that hard to understand.
So thanks for the fine work on debbugs again

        Andreas.

--
http://fam-tille.de



Reply to: