Re: Bug#290501: Patch to make spamscan work with 3.0
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Blars Blarson wrote:
> In article <[🔎] 20050721233213.GI29429@archimedes.ucr.edu> you write:
> >On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Blars Blarson wrote:
> >> The spamscan patch has some problems, I'm working on fixing them.
> >Hrm... what's wrong with it?
> $munged_mail is not defined in the duplacate case.
Ah, right. DAMN YOU MISSING "use strict;"! ;-)
> The unmunged message needs to be saved in this case, since
> spamassassin has not and should not be run on the message.
Yeah, I'll upload a fix for that shortly... it just needs to be
$mail->get_pristine instead of $munged_mail;
The beauty of the DRUNKENNESS subprogram was that you could move your
intoxication level up and down at will, instead of being caught on a
relentless down escalator to bargain basement philosophy and the
-- Rudy von Bitter _Software_ p124